Campaign

Tuesday 9 June 2026

NB0707BEN&JERRYS

Ben Cohen, co-founder of the iconic ice cream brand, is campaigning to regain control of its social mission after a dispute with its parent company

Ben Cohen was in handcuffs a year ago. A video shared on social media in May 2025 shows the now 75-year old co-founder of Ben & Jerry’s ice cream being escorted from the US Senate floor, hands tied, after protesting military aid to Israel.

“Congress kills poor kids in Gaza by buying bombs, and pays for it by kicking kids off Medicaid in the US,” he yelled in the direction of Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr. He was charged with a misdemeanor and later released from custody.

“I can’t call myself an American and not put my body on the line,” he told me this week in an interview on the sidelines of SXSW London. Despite a twisted ankle – and rumours circling that his beloved brand, which is now a subsidiary of Magnum Ice Cream, might be sold to private equity – Cohen is still campaigning.

He’s here to protest another injustice. Cohen claims that Magnum is stifling Ben & Jerry’s baked-in social mission, and has “dismantled” the independent board that oversees those aims. He’s launched a campaign to #FreeBen&Jerrys, hiring a marketing team and tapping up a consortium of like-minded investors to buy it back. For the activist-entrepreneur who started out selling ice-cream from a service station in Vermont, it’s characteristically bold.

Magnum says it has no intention to sell, to private equity or anyone else. It refutes Cohen’s claims, saying it remains committed to the company’s “three-part mission – economic, product and social” and also to the independent board structure that was agreed when the company sold to previous owners Unilever in 2000 for $326 million. Cohen made roughly $40 million on the sale, and donated roughly half of that to progressive causes.

So what gives? Cohen says that while he fought the sale initially, he says he was “pleasantly surprised” to see the social mission thrive. Under the auspices of the consumer giant Ben & Jerry’s launched the limited edition “Unfudge our Future”, a call for Australia’s leaders to ban fossil fuels, and “Change the Whirled”, a collaboration with Colin Kaepernick, the proceeds of which went to his “Know Your Rights Camp” youth organisation.

But regret emanates from Cohen: “To be quite frank, I understood that we gave it authority in writing, but I didn’t hold out very high hopes that that agreement was going to be abided by.”

Some governance experts argue that this legal framework of an independent, values-led board, while structurally ingenious, would ultimately melt without the acquirer’s willing cooperation. That was most obviously demonstrated in 2025, when Unilever blocked Ben & Jerry’s idea to create a watermelon-flavoured pint in support of Palestinians.

In the aftermath, Ben & Jerry’s CEO, David Stever, was ousted and replaced by a Unilever executive, and the parent company launched an audit of the Ben & Jerry’s Foundation’s accounts, which alleged a string of deficiencies, some of them related to the giving of funds to an NGO co-run by the chair of the independent board. Cohen says these are “false”.

Legal battles between Ben & Jerry’s board and Unilever were the start. But Cohen more directly attributes the moment it all started going wrong to the interventions of one man: the activist investor Nelson Peltz.

Newsletters

Choose the newsletters you want to receive

View more

For information about how The Observer protects your data, read our Privacy Policy

“After his entrance to the board, Unilever became Trumpified,” he says of Peltz, who bought a stake in Unilever in 2021. “He’s the guy who boasts that he’s the bully billionaire. He also boasts about introducing Elon Musk to Trump.”

Cohen also notes that Peltz’ influence has been carried, with his stake, over to Magnum, where a partner from his investment fund, Trian, holds a board seat. Trian and Peltz declined to comment.

But current employees of Magnum maintain that, even in the age of Trump, the business is still streaked through with activism. “I don’t see it as being muzzled,” said CEO Jay Curley in a statement at the company’s AGM. “I see us talking, speaking out about ICE… We’re continuing to talk about trans rights and Venezuela. We’re out being us, doing our thing.”

Granted, these are not the causes closest to the founder’s heart. Cohen’s focuses have always been disarmament, environmentalism and American foreign policy. It’s striking that he has little to say about arguably the biggest concentration of corporate power in the world today: AI companies. When I ask him whether he sees any parallels between Ben & Jerry’s story and the example of OpenAI dropping its non-profit status, he says he hasn’t followed it.

After nearly five decades of seeking to preserve purpose into the brand he founded, Cohen has learnt a few lessons. These days, he advocates for the stewardship structure (what he calls “B-Corp plus” and which is championed by the likes of Patagonia) as the best defense of corporate purpose, rather than independent boards. His advice to the next generation: study the fine print closely.

“Write it into the founding legal documents. The purpose of this business is not just to maximise profits, but to address social problems. At Ben and Jerry’s, we were careful not to put the social mission into the marketing department - we wanted to make a statement that we were doing these things because we thought it was just important, not to sell ice cream. It turned out that it did sell ice cream.”

When it pur­chased Ben & Jerry’s in 2000, Uni­lever, a mul­tina­tional con­glom­er­ate that owns more than 400 con­sumer-goods brands and brings in around $60 bil­lion in annual rev­enue, had agreed to uphold this social mis­sion and install an inde­pend­ent board ded­ic­ated to that task. The arrange­ment worked shock­ingly well for more than two dec­ades.

He’s always been—not the leader of the com­pany but a pro­vocateur,” said Jay Cur­ley, Ben & Jerry’s chief mar­ket­ing officer and an employee since 2008.

He now churns out social-media con­tent, includ­ing front­fa­cing videos implor­ing Ben & Jerry’s fans to des­cend upon Mag­num’s vari­ous pages, and zanier mater­ial, like an anim­a­tion of an anthro­po­morph­ized Mag­num ice-cream bar attack­ing a pint of Ben & Jerry’s.

In a video from Decem­ber, Cohen sits writ­ing a let­ter to Santa Claus, ask­ing for help reviv­ing the “spirit of the sea­son,” which entails, in part, free­ing Ben & Jerry’s

Follow

The Observer
The Observer Magazine
The ObserverNew Review
The Observer Food Monthly
Copyright © 2025 Tortoise MediaPrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions